AI ACT GUIDE
Updated 27 August 2026 · 4 min read
Crisp and AI Act Article 50: who must show the notice?
Crisp provides the widget. The site must tell visitors they are talking to AI, at the first interaction.
Crisp is a messaging tool, sometimes paired with an automated assistant. Article 50(1) is about informing the person who is chatting, not about the software brand. If the exchange is not obviously human, a clear notice must appear when the chat opens.
Burying it in the terms is not enough: Commission guidance rules out information that is only legal, late, or hard to see. A line such as “You are chatting with an automated assistant” next to the widget is the useful minimum.
Even if Crisp one day ships a native banner, the site remains responsible for its AI uses (other tools, content, legal pages) and for being able to prove them. A display log and a register are distinct from the chat itself.
Clairia detects the Crisp script on the homepage, looks for a visible notice, and can attach the notice to the widget. This is not a Crisp certification or an audit.
General information, not legal advice.